THE ‘MILLIONAIRE’ PHENOMENON
I’m not a big
believer in destiny. I can’t abide the notion that one’s life
course is pre-determined by some external expression of
providence. Luck, I believe, is the residue of design. We make our
own breaks. At least, this is how I choose to assess how my moment
in the primetime spotlight boosted my writing career.
In late March
2000, about ten months after STATES OF MIND was published, I found
myself in an entirely unexpected place – sitting across from Regis
Philbin, in front of a studio audience and nearly 30 million
television viewers, answering assorted trivia questions with loads
of money on the line. Somehow, despite my tendencies toward
cynicism and inhibition, I was a contestant on Who Wants to be
a Millionaire.
I didn’t win a
million dollars. But the real value of the experience came two
weeks later, when the episode aired at the peak of the quiz show’s
popularity. After I had answered the $64,000 question correctly
(and before I wimped out on the $125,000 question, despite my
instincts), Regis asked me to describe my latest book. I happily
obliged, and it turned out to be my most important answer of the
evening.
STATES OF MIND,
published by a small North Carolina-based publisher (John F.
Blair) and largely overlooked amid the parade of spring titles,
had been selling rather dismally. Last time I checked, it had been
the 122,000th best-selling book on Amazon.com. But
within a few hours of the show’s airing, it had skyrocketed to
#50. By the following evening, it was in the top ten.
The media got
wind of the story, and the ensuing days were surreal and rather
goofy. A USA Today columnist wrote, “Brad Herzog. Remember
the name. He just might be the next Stephen King or John Grisham.”
Time magazine weighed in on the phenomenon (“LIKE HIS
ANSWERS? BUY THE BOOK), followed by People and
Entertainment Weekly. Within a week, I was chatting with Matt
Lauer on the Today Show, after which STATES OF MIND rose to
#2, behind only a Harry Potter title. After that came an
appearance on Oprah. It was all very weird, and, of course,
all very gratifying.
I have some
residual ambivalence about the whole thing. I find it ironic that
a show associated with – let’s face it – greed and trivial matters
could be the platform for touting a search for virtue and
profundity in America. I’ve pointed out the incongruity in more
than a few interviews – suggesting that it’s sort of like writing
The Right Stuff and then going on The Gong Show to
promote it.
But you know
what? I don’t wish to write in a void. I write to make my voice
heard, to embark on a journey with the reader as my passenger. I
didn’t win a million bucks, but I won over a bunch of readers. And
that’s priceless.
If you want to
read more about the ‘Millionaire’ effect, check out “Mad
Money,” my account of the experience written for Cornell
Alumni Magazine.
|

|